Client
A partner of municipalities in Germany, providing street-cleaning and public-space maintenance services.
Delivered Scope
Engagement
Chudovo built the system from scratch.
Outcome
The client gained a working tool to monitor and manage the quality of street-cleaning services across public spaces.
Four actors drive this workflow: the citizen or inspector who reports an issue, the system that validates and routes it, the responsible department or field team that resolves it, and the inspector or supervisor who verifies the result.
The confirmed parts of this workflow are map-based object selection, condition assessment, and photo evidence. The table below uses routing, SLAs, and department hand-off to illustrate a target workflow; the delivered case did not confirm these specific functions.
| Step | Inspector Path | Citizen Path |
| 1 | Selects an assigned object on the map | Selects an issue category |
| 2 | Assesses condition against a checklist or scale | Sets location on the map or allows geolocation |
| 3 | Attaches photos, measurements, and comments | Adds a description and a photo |
| 4 | Submits the inspection | Submits the report |
| 5 | System creates a task for the responsible team | System routes the report to the responsible department |
| 6 | The field team completes the task, and an inspector or supervisor verifies the result | The system notifies the resident after the responsible team closes the issue |
Map-based object selection and geolocation have been shown in the Street Cleaning Software example. Chudovo takes this further to include a complete link between assets and their histories:
municipality → zone → asset → inspection template → inspection → evidence → issue → work order → verification → history
Each asset is uniquely defined in terms of its ID, category, and location. All reports or inspections of that asset build up one history for that asset, which helps departments know about any repeated problems, previous inspections, and current status all at once, rather than having to search different systems.
This shows a typical path from pilot to full rollout, not two fixed product tiers.
| Stage | What’s Typically Included | Status |
| Pilot | One district or asset category, citizen and inspector intake, map, photos, basic statuses | Delivered pattern |
| Operational Rollout | Department routing, configurable inspection templates, permissions, reporting | Common extension |
| Integration | Existing GIS, asset or work-order system, notifications, data migration | Project-specific option |
| Advanced Extension | Offline field work, cross-municipality setup, advanced analytics | Project-specific, scoped only where needed |
| Phase | What Happens | Timeframe |
| Discovery and Assessment | GIS and data discovery, accessibility and security/privacy review, pilot district or asset category selection | 2–4 weeks |
| Pilot | Citizen and inspector intake, map, photos, basic statuses, for one district or asset category | 3–5 months |
| Operational Rollout | Department routing, configurable inspection templates, permissions, reporting, staff training | 5–9 months |
| Integration and Migration | Existing GIS, asset or work-order system, notifications, data migration, acceptance testing | Scoped per project |